Impedance Simulation of Differential Transmission Lines Considering ESD Protection Diode Components

Transmitting high-bandwidth data between transmitter and receiver over a single twisted pair (STP) requires additional ESD (electrostatic discharge) protection components at transmitter and receiver sides. These protection components are mounted on the printed circuit board (PCB). With a data rate of 6 Gbps, the design of the PCB transmission line has to consider the ESD protection components in terms of signal integrity. In this blog article, we present the influence of the ESD protection component and the necessary layout optimization to preserve the signal integrity. Finally, we show the comparison between the simulation result and measurement

By Richard Sjiariel

Waveguide Modeling

With the data transmission over a single twisted-pair cable, the connection on the PCB is realized using an edge-coupled surface microstrip conductor. Mostly differential signaling is used for high-speed data transmission. This provides a good electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). Typically, an edge-coupled surface microstrip conductor with a nominal line impedance of 100 Ω is used and located at the TOP layer. Figure 1 shows the dimension of such a waveguide used for the simulation.

Figure 1. Differential line model with dimensions

For a line impedance calculation, the correct material property and the modeling of the correct solder mask shape are important. As shown in Figure 1, the modeling of the solder mask is realized as a thin skin, covering the microstrip conductor.

As the differential line is connected to the cable through a plug, a possible ESD event is very likely to occur at this plug. Such an ESD event generates very high voltage and current peaks within a short time range ( < 1 ns) and it can cause damage to the electronic components. In order to avoid this, ESD protection components should be connected to both conductors of the differential line. Very often TVS (Transient Voltage Suppressor) diodes are used for such applications. They have a very fast response-time and limit the voltage to a certain value within a short time.

With a high-speed data rate of 6 Gbps, it is important to use small component package sizes with low parasitic elements. For the analyzed geometry, we were using the ESD protection diode PESD5V0C1BLS-Q from NEXPERIA [1]. This device has a maximum diode capacitance of 0.3 pF and a small package size of 1 mm x 0.6 mm x 0.47 mm. In the simulation, the ESD diodes are defined using “lumped elements”. They are reproduced by their parasitic capacity only. “Lumped elements” are CST internal elements, which can represent R, L, C components. Figure 2 shows the simulation model of the differential line including the ESD diodes.

Figure 2. Simulation model of a differential line with the ESD diodes

In Figure 2 it can be seen that the landing pads of the ESD components on the differential signal line are wider than the trace. Obviously, the cross-section change at this particular position leads to a line impedance change. Depending on the size of the impedance change, there is an impact to the signal integrity.

Pre-Layout TDR Simulation

A well-known method to analyze the line impedance along a transmission line is the time domain reflectometry method (TDR). It works similarly to the radar principle, where a pulse is transmitted and the reflected signal is recorded back at the input side. Information about the impedance curve can be obtained by evaluating the reflected signals. CST Studio Suite can also perform TDR simulation using either the time domain- or frequency domain solver. For this pre-layout investigation, we use the frequency domain solver. This is justified because of the relatively simple structure for discretization and its small size compared to the wavelength. As the frequency domain solver delivers only the S-Parameter results, we calculate the TDR results by post-processing the return loss S-Parameter S11. With a Gaussian signal defined as the input signal, the output signal can be reconstructed from the return loss information. We calculate TDR by applying Equation 1.                 

The maximum frequency range defined in the simulation is 8.4 GHz, which corresponds to the 10%-90% rise time of 104 ps.

Figure 3. Time integration of Gaussian pulse

CST Studio Suite can perform this calculation automatically using the template-based post-processing “TDR calculation from S-Parameter”, as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4. Template Based Post-Processing of TDR calculation from S-Parameter

Although the diode capacitance value is considerably small (0.3 pF), it has to be considered when performing the TDR simulation. It reduces the nominal line impedance (100 Ω). Figure 5 illustrates the comparison with – and without considering this capacitance.

Figure 5. TDR simulation with- and without diode capacitance
Layout Modification

A maximum allowed impedance variation of ± 10% is typically set when designing high-speed data lanes. With a 100 Ω reference impedance, we can see from Figure 5 that the curve drops down to

83 Ω. This would fail the lower limit (90 Ω) of the requirements. To fulfill the impedance requirement, a layout optimization around the ESD diode location must be performed.  
Since the ESD diode capacitance reduces the line impedance in this region, it is necessary to compensate this effect by reducing the capacitance per meter of the transmission line. The most effective method to do this is to cut out the reference plane below the ESD diodes. The optimal size of the recessed ground area can be found by simulation. Figure 6 shows an optimized configuration of the modified reference plane for a certain layer construction after several simulation iterations.

Figure 6. Reference plane with cut-out (GND vias are not visible)

The corresponding impedance curve improvement can be seen in Figure 7.

Figure 7. Impedance comparison with- and without the cut-out at the reference plane

Please note that the cut-out in the ground plane may allow crosstalk from and to other switching or interference signals. Therefore, it is recommended not to route any sensitive signal line below this cut-out. In the PCB layout design tool, this can be ensured by creating a restricted/keep-out area.

The improvement of the line impedance can also be seen from the return loss S-parameter S11

(Figure 8). An improvement of around 12 dB for the return loss can be observed. This also means an improvement for the signal integrity. 

Figure 8. Return loss (S11) comparison with- and without the cut-out at the reference plane

The better signal integrity behavior of the recessed reference plane can also be demonstrated by comparing the eye-diagram results. The used digital Pseudo Random Bit Sequences (PRBS) have the following properties:

  • PRBS12
  • Differential voltage level ± 200 mV
  • Rise and fall time of 80 ps and period length corresponds to 3 GHz

Figure 9 and Figure 10 show the eye diagram for both layouts.

Figure 9. Eye-diagram with cut-out of the reference plane.
Figure 10. Eye-diagram without cut-out of the reference plane.
Measurement Comparison

To confirm the simulation results, a PCB layout with optimized parameters (found by CST Studio Suite simulation) has been created. The TDR impedance measurement has been performed with a differential TDR measurement-system from Sequid. During the measurement, the transmission line was connected via SMA sockets. For the simulation, it is not necessary to consider the connectors because they only increase the computing power and time and have no influence to the line impedance around the ESD diodes. The end of the differential line can be left open.

The manufactured PCB prototype for the measurement is a standard FR-4 board with 4-layers and a total thickness of around 1.6 mm. The differential pair dimension differs slightly from the one used in the pre-layout investigation, but the reference plane cut-out dimensions remain the same. Figure 11 shows a section of the PCB layout prototype used for measurement comparison by CST Studio Suite.

Figure 11. PCB prototype model inside CST MWS.

The comparison of the line impedance results between measurement and simulation is shown in Figure 12. The good agreement to the measurement confirms the simulation with CST MWS.

Figure 12. Impedance comparison between measurement and simulation.

To transmit high-speed data signals, it is important to achieve a smooth line impedance curve for the whole high-speed data lane. The signal integrity requirements are typically ± 10% from the reference impedance. In this blog article, we presented the 3D layout simulation and optimization of such a transmission line using CST Studio Suite. We demonstrated the benefits of using this simulation tool in the pre-layout phase, especially regarding the development time. We showed that it is important to respect the ESD diode component (capacitive information) during the optimization, to achieve more realistic results. Finally, a good agreement between simulation and measurement confirmed the accuracy of the simulation results with CST Studio Suite.